![]() The nudity page even has a link to another wiki that announces that it pushes a pro-naturist POV on Wikipedia. The whole subject of nudity in Wikipedia seems to be dominated by pro-nudity viewpoints. This article is a complete disaster of the moment, and could probably use a complete rewrite. ![]() I gave a section of this article an inappropriate tone tag and excised some of the more egregious passages. Let's make it better! Cheers! User:Dandelion ( talk| contribs) 05:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Reply Thanks for contributing! I do agree this is a very POV article. I am not aware of any controversy, however, if there is some it should be mentioned in a NPOV way. ![]() I also created a separate page because the material was strong enough to warrant a special page on the subject. ![]() The Nudity article was getting way too long so I broke off three to four topics today that could stand on their own. ![]() At the very least, you're going to need specific quoted sources for all your "nudists believe." statements to make it clear that these are not simply your own opinions attributed to a nebulous nudist community.ĭan B† Dan D 00:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Reply If its POV, lets make it NPOV. To me, this page looks like it may be a POV fork. What is the point of this page? I really don't see why it exists separate from the main "nudism" article. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |